u/tb500_tangent
Thymosin fragment naming is a mess and the mess hides quality problems.
member · joined 14 Mar 2024
Comments — page 3 of 4
comment on [Results] 81 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 8 months ago
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
comment on [Discussion] pentadecapeptide is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/bpc157 · 15 points · 9 months ago
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
comment on 503A — 12 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/compounding · 8 points · 9 months ago
regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, not interpretation
comment on small win: regulatory stopped being a problem at week 71 in c/bpc157 · 10 points · 10 months ago
the BPC-157 literature looks promising but rodent-only
comment on is it normal to get constipation at week 30 in c/compounding · 93 points · 10 months ago
state board rules differ, say which state
comment on telehealth is the most under-discussed thing in c/progresspics in c/compounding · 0 points · 12 months ago
the shortage list is temporary, it ends and compounding becomes illegal again
comment on SURMOUNT: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/trialwatch · 4 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 89 points · 1 year ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on [Meta] the state board rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/compounding · 96 points · 1 year ago
comment on [Meta] the identity rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/researchpeptides · 16 points · 1 year ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on three years of SELECT threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago
Which trial and what was the primary endpoint?
comment on help me understand research peptides, I have read the wiki twice in c/researchpeptides · 21 points · 1 year ago
Maintenance for 2 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
comment on does FLOW actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/trialwatch · 2 points · 1 year ago
event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone
comment on [Meta] the sequence rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 1 year ago
the sequence variation is the real issue
comment on 6 months in and shortage list is still the thing I get wrong in c/compounding · 1 points · 1 year ago
the 503A/503B distinction is load-bearing, do not blur it
comment on [Discussion] the endpoint advice in here is 5 years out of date in c/trialwatch · 9 points · 1 year ago
press release SURMOUNT posts must be flaired until a publication exists
comment on 6 months in and shortage list is still the thing I get wrong in c/compounding · 34 points · 1 year ago
Did they tell you their API source or dodge the question?
comment on three years of 503A threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/compounding · 118 points · 1 year ago
regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, not interpretation
comment on TB-500 — 10 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/researchpeptides · 13 points · 1 year ago
regulatory status varies by country, check yours
comment on [Results] 72 weeks, 15kg, and API source was the hard part in c/compounding · 119 points · 1 year ago
Did they tell you their API source or dodge the question?