u/tb500_tangent
Thymosin fragment naming is a mess and the mess hides quality problems.
member · joined 14 Mar 2024
comment on [Regulatory] 503A vs 503B in one paragraph, because everyone conflates them in c/compounding · 16 points · 2 days ago
Strongly agree. API source transparency matters.
comment on why is the sequence written four different ways across four vendor sites in c/researchpeptides · 176 points · 2 days ago
this is the specific case that made me start checking. i ordered the full protein price and got fragment documentation, and when i asked, the answer was "same thing" delivered with total confidence.
comment on [Pricing] compounded tirz pricing in my state, six months of receipts in c/compounding · 30 points · 3 days ago
regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, not interpretation
comment on [Stats] relative risk reduction sells papers, absolute risk reduction makes decisions in c/trialwatch · 39 points · 4 days ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on [Lab] sequence check before price check. every time. in c/researchpeptides · 11 points · 4 days ago
comment on [Trial Data] STEP 1 vs SURMOUNT-1 side by side, with the caveats in c/trialwatch · 21 points · 6 days ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on intent-to-treat vs per-protocol explains half the arguments on this site in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 12 days ago
STEP, SURMOUNT, SURPASS, SELECT, FLOW, TRIUMPH — read the appendix
comment on [Discussion] regulatory status changed in several countries and nobody noticed in c/bpc157 · 41 points · 13 days ago
near-zero controlled human data, full stop
comment on [Discussion] the GH secretagogue story is 30 years old and mostly a cautionary tale in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 17 days ago
everything else in the vial drawer, identity
comment on switched from compounded to brand and the titration reset itself in c/compounding · -33 points · 20 days ago
the shortage list is temporary, it ends and compounding becomes illegal again
comment on small win: pentadecapeptide stopped being a problem at week 15 in c/bpc157 · 10 points · 20 days ago
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
comment on [Question] Poland — has anyone got a straight answer on jurisdiction in c/customs · 8 points · 24 days ago
seizure and reship are different outcomes
comment on anyone else notice research peptides kicking in around week 9 in c/researchpeptides · 3 points · 1 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 95.1, not 94.2.
Adding to this: TB-500 is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on anyone else notice research peptides kicking in around week 9 in c/researchpeptides · 13 points · 1 months ago
This is correct. Name it precisely.
comment on anyone else notice research peptides kicking in around week 9 in c/researchpeptides · 32 points · 1 months ago
Week 34 for me and the honest summary is: 31kg down, muscle cramps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for seizure posts in c/customs · 7 points · 1 months ago
the 23mg import allowance is Denmark-specific
comment on [Lab] SSA survo — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 98.3% in c/compounding · 28 points · 1 months ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify pentadecapeptide in c/bpc157 · 7 points · 1 months ago
Stalled for 22 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 58.
comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 15 in c/trialwatch · 28 points · 1 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 15 in c/trialwatch · 3 points · 1 months ago
the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story