[Vendor] QST order #21 — Canada, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside
Right, the ApoB question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 22 data points over 10 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 64, not week 18. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
baseline is the most important bloodwork measurement, you cannot collect it later
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
eGFR noise during rapid loss is expected
Baseline ALT: 96.2. Week 61: 98.6. Same lab, fasted, same time of day. Trend matters.
Do you have baseline to compare to?
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
ferritin tanks quietly on a reduced appetite, check it
Baseline eGFR: 98.3. Week 77: 98.0. Same lab, fasted, same time of day. Trend matters.
Baseline eGFR: 98.3.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
This is correct. ApoB is the better marker.
ApoB from 20 to 39 is movement, not noise
redact identifying details from lab PDFs before posting
baseline is the most important ferritin measurement, you cannot collect it later
eGFR noise on rapid loss is real. 18 week noise, 6 week trend. Do not panic at week 95.
Strongly agree. ALT is where you catch the liver story early.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
This is correct. ApoB is the better marker.
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
post reference ranges with your numbers, units differ by country and lab
Yeah, baseline matters more than any later number.
eGFR noise on rapid loss is real. 6 week noise, 32 week trend. Do not panic at week 37.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
ALT is where the fatty-liver story shows up first
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
- 1Do you have baseline to compare to?10 comments in this branch · started by u/ravi_sandvik
- 2eGFR noise on rapid loss is real. 18 week noise, 6 week trend. Do not panic…6 comments in this branch · started by u/emeka_chowdhury