CagriSema vs REDEFINE — genuinely asking which matters more
Confession thread, sort of. I went from 2.4mg to 0.5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 20 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have muscle…
This is correct. The co-agonism is real.
[removed by moderator]
Not to be pedantic but cagrilintide and satiety are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
[removed by moderator]
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
REDEFINE phase 7 readouts are interesting but 7 person satiety is different from 7 trial satiety.
Yeah, amylin is doing different work than GLP-1.
tendon and CagriSema literature in rodents is interesting
CagriSema ratios in trials are fixed, do not extrapolate self-mixing
Yeah, amylin is doing different work than GLP-1.
REDEFINE readouts are phase 13 data
CagriSema is a fixed combo in trials, not user-mixed
research use only, no human protocols in posts