GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
-19
c/cagrilintide·posted 1 year ago by u/rania_salinas

[Discussion] satiety is doing more work than we give it credit for

Discussion

Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.

The advice on REDEFINE in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.

I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.

36 up / 55 down40% upvoted8 commentsid 1aqeyu13 Nov 2024

8 comments

8 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/egfr_watcher4 points·1 year ago

REDEFINE phase 12 readouts are interesting but 12 person satiety is different from 12 trial satiety.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_fonseca3 points·1 year ago

REDEFINE readouts are phase 14 data

replysharereportpermalink
u/georgi_chowdhury2 points·1 year ago

not approved anywhere, keep posts descriptive, not instructional

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_ilunga3 points·1 year ago

Rodent or human data?

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]1 point·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/declared_value_dv1 point·1 year ago

research use only, no human protocols in posts

replysharereportpermalink
u/incretin_ivyMOD2 points·1 year ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_mensah1 point·1 year ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/cagrilintide

Amylin analog pharmacology and the CagriSema combination: why amylin and GLP-1 co-agonism produces a different satiety profile, the REDEFINE readouts, and the very limited pool of people handling cagrilintide as research material.

19kmembers
62submissions
Feb 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/cagrilintide
c/cagrilintide rules
  1. Amylin is not a GLP-1. Posts conflating them get corrected.
  2. CagriSema ratios in trials are fixed-dose. Do not extrapolate to self-mixing.
  3. Not approved anywhere. Keep posts descriptive, not instructional.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/amylin_amyu/incretin_ivyu/ledger_mod
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →