[Lab] first independent cagrilintide purity number i have seen
co-agonism. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.
Everything else people worry about in c/labresults is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort co-agonism out first, and almost nobody does.
I say this having got it wrong for 21 months. My fasting insulin was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
CagriSema is a fixed combo in trials, not user-mixed
Strongly agree. REDEFINE is phase 21, not final.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
research use only, no human protocols in posts
Rodent or human data?
the co-agonism question is real and interesting
long-acting amylin is CagriSema, different satiety profile
Strongly agree. REDEFINE is phase 6, not final.
Strongly agree.
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
amylin is not a GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected
amylin is not a GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected
Adding to this: amylin is doing more work than the comment implies.
- 1Rodent or human data?9 comments in this branch · started by u/slow_logbook_notes30
- 2the VendorInvestigate number or it did not happen5 comments in this branch · started by u/liv_kuipers