[Meta] the cycle rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on perimenopause in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers…
Crossposting this to c/t2dglp1 because the people who need it are not reading this community.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
fertility signal is there but unclear
hormonal contraception interactions are speculative
Crossposting this to c/t2dglp1 because the people who need it are not reading this community.
Adding to this: insulin resistance is doing more work than the comment implies.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
pregnancy and trying-to-conceive get clinician pointer, not community advice
Small correction: the trial was 11 weeks, not 26. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Strongly agree. Cycle changes are documented.
hormonal contraception interactions are speculative
contraception interaction claims need citation