[Results] 67 weeks, 26kg, and gradient was the hard part
Genuinely asking, not being difficult.
Everyone in c/glp1uk repeats that gradient is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 2 threads of people agreeing with each other.
Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?
I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.6. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.6.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
related substances are where the story lives, not the main peak
The Medutest result being close to my own HPLC is the signal, not the absolute number. Both are right.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
two labs, two different baselines, two different purity numbers, both honest
co-elution is real and purity is usually not enough to resolve it
Yeah, the chromatogram profile matters more than the headline number.
Yeah, the chromatogram profile matters more than the headline number.
co-elution is real and purity is usually not enough to resolve it
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
chromatogram or it did not happen
state the method: column, gradient, detection wavelength, injection volume
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
- 1Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell…13 comments in this branch · started by u/honest_syringe_pls