week 6 check-in — 46kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me
Right, the chromatogram question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 13 data points over 6 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 3, not week 52. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
A shoulder on the main peak that 8 analysts integrated 7 different ways. Same trace, 98.6 spread.
A shoulder on the main peak that 8 analysts integrated 7 different ways.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
chromatogram or it did not happen
chromatogram or it did not happen
Adding to this: integration is doing more work than the comment implies.
two labs, two different baselines, two different purity numbers, both honest
This is the correct method framing. Column and gradient are load-bearing fields.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Detection wavelength? LC-MS and that changes at different wavelengths.
- 1The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…6 comments in this branch · started by u/mass_spec_maggie