[Meta] proposal — a flair for orforglipron posts
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: small molecule matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 13 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 3 people measuring the…
the UK here. Waited 10 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.
the supply conversation changes if this approves
the supply conversation changes if this approves
Adding to this: non-peptide is doing more work than the comment implies.
small molecule purity is different testing than peptides
Not to be pedantic but orforglipron and small molecule are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
What was the batch number and which service?
the UK here. Waited 5 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.
the absorption problem is solved by non-peptide structure
the UK here.
Adding to this: ATTAIN is doing more work than the comment implies.
Strongly agree. The supply impact would be huge.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
small molecule purity is different testing than peptides