20 months in and non-peptide is still the thing I get wrong
ACHIEVE. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/bpc157 is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort ACHIEVE out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 8 months. My A1c was…
small molecule purity is different testing than peptides
small molecule purity is different testing than peptides
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
the absorption problem is solved by non-peptide structure
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 99.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
the supply conversation changes if this approves
the fatigue profile is speculative at this stage