GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of unpopular opinion: retatrutide is massively overrated — 68 comments in the full submission. View in context.
8.7k
c/retatrutide·submitted 2 years ago by u/source_or_silence

unpopular opinion: retatrutide is massively overrated

Discussionbranch of 15 comments

Confession thread, sort of. I went from 2.5mg to 1.0mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 8 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have constipation…

Read the full submission and all 68 comments →

This branch

15 comments, started 2 years ago
u/blunt_coldbox_202460 points·2 years ago

phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_nilsen31 points·2 years ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/source_or_silenceOP24 points·2 years ago

the dosing is steep, the injection-site soreness reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet

replysharereportpermalink
u/placebo_arm_pam8 points·2 years ago

Are you quoting phase 2 or is there phase 3 data now?

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_weiss10 points·2 years ago

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rui_only_ro7 points·2 years ago

retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions

replysharereportpermalink
u/trialwatch_theotrial nerd6 points·2 years ago

the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy

replysharereportpermalink
u/source_or_silence45 points·2 years ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nikhil_lindqvist12 points·2 years ago

Not convinced.

Adding to this: phase 2 is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/source_or_silence4 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_eriksen35 points·2 years ago

retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions

replysharereportpermalink
u/fabio_lehtinen18 points·2 years ago

retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions

Adding to this: TRIUMPH is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aa_analysis_andy9 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.

replysharereportpermalink
u/fabio_lehtinen4 points·2 years ago

retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_eriksen2 points·2 years ago

This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.