GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] two reta batches, two services, 98.4% and 97.9% — 34 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.9k
c/retatrutide·submitted 4 days ago by u/liver_enzyme_liz

[Lab] two reta batches, two services, 98.4% and 97.9%

Labbranch of 11 comments

Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/newbiequestions repeats that dose escalation is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 3 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is…

Read the full submission and all 34 comments →

This branch

11 comments, started 3 days ago
u/mateusz_mensah72 points·3 days ago

The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_20240 points·3 days ago

TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter

replysharereportpermalink
u/liver_enzyme_lizOP1 point·3 days ago

TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_marchand1 point·3 days ago

nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_zielinski1 point·3 days ago

the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder

replysharereportpermalink
u/liver_enzyme_lizOP1 point·3 days ago·edited

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nadia_trevino59 points·3 days ago

TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 99.2% weight loss but the early fullness profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]21 points·3 days ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (3) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.