is it normal to get nausea at week 65
Been lurking in c/sideeffects for about 10 months and finally have something worth posting.
Short version: week 67, 15mg, and triple agonist is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 25 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle.
What I actually want to know is whether the people saying it does not matter have measured it, or whether it is just repeated confidently. Happy to be told I am overthinking this — I probably am — but I would rather overthink it now than at week 73.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
- 1Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3…5 comments in this branch · started by u/nordic_pricing