[Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on dose escalation
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: glucagon matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 23 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 35 people measuring the same…
the 0.5mg arm is different from 2.4mg, results do not transfer
Are you quoting phase 2 or is there phase 3 data now?
the 15mg arm is different from 12.5mg, results do not transfer
the 5mg arm is different from 7.5mg, results do not transfer
The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.
the dosing is steep, the constipation reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
Small correction: the trial was 16 weeks, not 11. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.