GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the fatigue got better, not worse — 61 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.2k
c/retatrutide·submitted 2 years ago by u/noor_ivaturi

switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the fatigue got better, not worse

Cautionbranch of 10 comments

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking retatrutide against ApoB for 19 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one…

Read the full submission and all 61 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 2 years ago
u/reflux_report90 points·2 years ago

Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nausea_notesside effects69 points·2 years ago

phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial

replysharereportpermalink
u/careful_gradient_again25 points·2 years ago

Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modmod · vetting20 points·2 years ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/fabio_lehtinen48 points·2 years ago

retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions

replysharereportpermalink
u/aa_analysis_andy21 points·2 years ago

retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions

Adding to this: TRIUMPH is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rui_only_ro27 points·2 years ago

phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial

replysharereportpermalink
u/andres_restrepo32 points·2 years ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/elodie_grimaldi48 points·2 years ago

the dosing is steep, the nausea reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_2024130 points·2 years ago

The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.