GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of what changed for me between week 65 and week 13 — 35 comments in the full submission. View in context.
12k
c/retatrutide·submitted 2 years ago by u/reflux_report

what changed for me between week 65 and week 13

Trial Databranch of 10 comments

I have had 9 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 40 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February. The independent number came back 97.9% against a claimed…

Read the full submission and all 35 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 2 years ago
u/incretin_ivyMOD2.1k points·2 years ago

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]1.4k points·2 years ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/helga_vermeulen793 points·2 years ago

[deleted]

Adding to this: dose escalation is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/freya_baptista1.1k points·2 years ago

the dosing is steep, the sulphur burps reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet

replysharereportpermalink
u/kofi_balogun1.3k points·2 years ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with phase 2, not with what you concluded.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reflux_reportOP584 points·2 years ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_molnar298 points·2 years ago

nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring

replysharereportpermalink
u/reflux_reportOP1k points·2 years ago

TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 97.4% weight loss but the constipation profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cagrilintide_enthusiast601 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reflux_reportOP832 points·2 years ago

the dosing is steep, the fatigue reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.