GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of help me understand glucagon, I have read the wiki twice — 42 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.9k
c/retatrutide·submitted 3 months ago by u/ledger_mod

help me understand glucagon, I have read the wiki twice

Questionbranch of 8 comments

Been lurking in c/sideeffects for about 5 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 24, 1.7mg, and triple agonist is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 39 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to…

Read the full submission and all 42 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 3 months ago
u/two_mil_or_one495 points·3 months ago

the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modOPmod · vetting347 points·3 months ago

the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/placebo_arm_pam167 points·3 months ago

triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual

replysharereportpermalink
u/trialwatch_theotrial nerd125 points·3 months ago

Which trial arm and what was the n?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modOPmod · vetting74 points·3 months ago

The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hugo_pires120 points·3 months ago·edited

the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose.

Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 95.1% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_vanhecke155 points·3 months ago

Which trial arm and what was the n?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modOPmod · vetting99 points·3 months ago·edited

Dose escalation on retatrutide is steeper and faster than on semaglutide. Do not assume the titration patterns transfer.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.