GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside — 50 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.3k
c/retatrutide·submitted 2 months ago by u/nadia_trevino

[Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside

Questionbranch of 15 comments

Been lurking in c/progresspics for about 20 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 82, 10mg, and TRIUMPH is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 9 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to know…

Read the full submission and all 50 comments →

This branch

15 comments, started 2 months ago
u/deleted_my_history62 points·2 months ago

the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder

replysharereportpermalink
u/rohan_cardoso31 points·2 months ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/andres_restrepo33 points·2 months ago

TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter

replysharereportpermalink
u/matias_falk25 points·2 months ago

TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/iman_castellanos29 points·2 months ago

phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial

replysharereportpermalink
u/nordic_pricing10 points·2 months ago

the 5mg arm is different from 2.5mg, results do not transfer

replysharereportpermalink
u/nadia_trevinoOP23 points·2 months ago

TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_bruun14 points·2 months ago

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

replysharereportpermalink
u/soren_nkemelu11 points·2 months ago

Rodent data is rodent data.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 96 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/naomi_erdogan3 points·2 months ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rekha_vestergaard3 points·2 months ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/elodie_grimaldi9 points·2 months ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink
u/injection_site_iris5 points·2 months ago

Did you actually measure heart rate or is that a feeling?

replysharereportpermalink
u/anya_moreau2 points·2 months ago

the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy

replysharereportpermalink
u/incretin_ivypharmacology4 points·2 months ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.