the appetite return question that gets asked weekly, answered properly
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 0.25mg, week 54, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — discontinuation — and tracked it for 14 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, regain is not a failure.
The injection-site soreness was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
cite the discontinuation data rather than guessing regain rates
say how long you were on and at what dose before taper
interval stretching versus dose reduction
This is correct. Discontinuation data is real.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Flair changed to match the content.
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
This is correct. Discontinuation data is real.
Strongly agree. The regain is expected.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with tapering, not with what you concluded.
regain on taper is expected, plan for it
What was the batch number and which service?
Strongly agree. The regain is expected.
- 1Yeah, regain is not a failure.6 comments in this branch · started by u/fabio_lehtinen
- 2This is correct. Discontinuation data is real.6 comments in this branch · started by u/helga_vermeulen