[Meta] proposal — a flair for SURMOUNT posts
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: tirzepatide matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 13 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 29 people measuring the…
This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 98.3% body weight at 13 weeks.
the dual agonism hits different and that is why people describe it differently
[removed by moderator]
[removed by moderator]
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 98.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Not to be pedantic but dual agonist and 15mg are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.