switched from 12.5mg to 10mg and the nausea got better, not worse
I have had 12 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 34 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
stalled on sema, tried tirz, and the curves were actually different shapes
I am going to push back on this slightly.
the GIP side does different things than the GLP-1 side, that is the point
the GIP side does different things than the GLP-1 side, that is the point
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 67 weeks to accept.
Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.
the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery
I am going to push back on this slightly.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
the GIP side does different things than the GLP-1 side, that is the point
Slight fix: the number was 99.0, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Vial-splitting is on-topic here. Do not ask about pen-cracking, that goes in c/reconstitution.
the GIP side does different things than the GLP-1 side, that is the point
the GIP side does different things than the GLP-1 side, that is the point
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there
Vial-splitting is on-topic here.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 37 weeks to accept.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
Zepbound and Mounjaro are literally the same drug, the name is the only difference
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
How long at each step before you escalated?
My hs-CRP moved faster on tirz than on sema at the same timepoint, which matches what people report.
Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.
How long at each step before you escalated?
Zepbound and Mounjaro are literally the same drug, the name is the only difference
- 1Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On…6 comments in this branch · started by u/emil_barros
- 2Vial-splitting is on-topic here. Do not ask about pen-cracking, that goes in…6 comments in this branch · started by u/priya_guerrero