[Vendor] QST order #9 — Spain, 31 days, no drama, receipts inside
I have had 17 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 32 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 97.9% against a claimed 94.2%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
week 11 on Mounjaro and the appetite profile is genuinely different from sema
[deleted]
My hs-CRP moved faster on tirz than on sema at the same timepoint, which matches what people report.
Did the sulphur burps feel the same as on tirz or genuinely different?
Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.
the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery
This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 96.8% body weight at 17 weeks.
week 79 on Mounjaro and the appetite profile is genuinely different from sema
the dual agonism hits different and that is why people describe it differently
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Strongly agree. Tirz is better than sema is not a claim without a comparator dose.
week 76 on Mounjaro and the appetite profile is genuinely different from sema
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
- 1source?11 comments in this branch · started by u/sten_bhattacharya