GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
722
c/trialwatch·posted 4 months ago by u/camila_vasquez

[Lab] 11th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part

Paper Clean Column ×7

Week 24 update. 25kg down from the start, reflux basically gone since about week 64.

Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with reflux.

The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.

Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.

980 up / 258 down79% upvoted21 commentsid 4pgbaz4 Mar 2026

21 comments

13 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/nordic_pricing157 points·4 months ago

What was the dropout rate?

replysharereportpermalink
u/hamza_weiss228 points·4 months ago

event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_vasquezOP124 points·4 months ago

SURMOUNT-4 discontinuation arm showed regain. That is the reality of a chronic disease treatment, not a failure.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rohan_steiner71 points·4 months ago

SELECT reported a SURMOUNT hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.

replysharereportpermalink
u/adaeze_cabrera33 points·4 months ago

What was the dropout rate?

replysharereportpermalink
u/draw_up_dizzy26 points·4 months ago

This is correct. Discontinuation arms show the regain reality.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ines_castellanos7 points·4 months ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_almeida69 points·4 months ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]50 points·4 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/draw_up_dizzy44 points·4 months ago

the 18 week readout is different from the 38 week readout

replysharereportpermalink
u/adaeze_cabrera24 points·4 months ago

the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story

replysharereportpermalink
u/pancreatitis_scare13 points·4 months ago

Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cesar_ivaturi7 points·4 months ago

STEP, SURMOUNT, SURPASS, SELECT, FLOW, TRIUMPH — read the appendix

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/trialwatch

Clinical trial reading group. New readouts, protocol amendments, endpoint definitions, dropout handling, and the difference between a press release and a publication. Absolute risk reduction and number-needed-to-treat are house dialect here.

34kmembers
95submissions
Nov 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/trialwatch rules
  1. Press-release-only posts must be flaired Press Release until a publication exists.
  2. Give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body.
  3. Relative risk reduction alone is not a result. Show the absolute numbers.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.