u/bianca_demir
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Salvador.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
comment on [CGM] what the postprandial curve actually looks like before and after in c/t2dglp1 · 2 points · 2 days ago
the 51 A1c trend is the answer
comment on [Caution] stacking with a sulfonylurea is a real hypo risk, not a theoretical one in c/t2dglp1 · 13 points · 3 days ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on [Janoshik] WWB sema 10mg — 98.6%, batch and method inside in c/labresults · 4 points · 8 days ago
the 96.8% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
comment on [Lab] my running table: 34 tests, 11 vendors, three years in c/labresults · 12 points · 19 days ago
multiple batches from SGN show a spread, that is the data
comment on [Meta] the hypoglycaemia rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/t2dglp1 · 9 points · 1 months ago
This is correct.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 15 weeks to accept.
comment on is it normal to get constipation at week 94 in c/scamalerts · 6 points · 1 months ago
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
comment on [Below Spec] 94.1% with a 1.8% single impurity. is that the des-amido in c/labresults · 8 points · 1 months ago
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on the A1c thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/t2dglp1 · 16 points · 1 months ago
This is correct. Hypo risk is real.
comment on test results — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 1 points · 3 months ago
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
comment on unpopular opinion: exit scam is massively overrated in c/scamalerts · 57 points · 4 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on genuine question about cloned site that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 4 months ago
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
comment on [Discussion] the T2D advice in here is 16 years out of date in c/t2dglp1 · 4 points · 4 months ago
Week 84 for me and the honest summary is: 15kg down, constipation manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
comment on small win: fake COA stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/scamalerts · 58 points · 5 months ago
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
comment on [Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/scamalerts · 20 points · 5 months ago
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
comment on [Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/scamalerts · 16 points · 5 months ago
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
comment on three years of test results threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/labresults · 61 points · 6 months ago
Batch number? Date of test?
comment on [Question] PDF metadata — what am I missing here in c/scamalerts · 43 points · 6 months ago
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
comment on tried Medutest for 15 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 328 points · 10 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on fraud: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 1 year ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on scam: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 323 points · 1 year ago
Did MKM respond or ghost you?