u/careful_gradient
Came for one answer, stayed for three years.
member · joined 25 Apr 2023
Overview — page 3 of 5
comment on [Meta] the cycle rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/glp1women · 4 points · 5 months ago
[deleted]
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 12 weeks to accept.
comment on PCOS — my 11-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1women · 37 points · 6 months ago
How many weeks between the two measurements?
comment on the integration question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/hplc · 8 points · 7 months ago
axis labels included, always
comment on someone explain regain to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/tapering · 26 points · 7 months ago
interval stretching versus dose reduction
Adding to this: tapering is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on LC-MS in c/hplc · 15 points · 7 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 94.2, not 95.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on [Question] purity — what am I missing here in c/hplc · 1 points · 8 months ago
Not to be pedantic but method development and chromatogram are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Question] purity — what am I missing here in c/hplc · 98 points · 8 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on tried PCOS for 16 weeks. here is what happened. in c/glp1women · 1 points · 9 months ago
contraception interaction claims need citation
comment on am I the only one who found rodent data harder than the injections in c/bpc157 · 57 points · 9 months ago
Stalled for 2 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 82.
comment on PDF metadata — my 11-week log, condensed into one table in c/scamalerts · 19 points · 9 months ago
the CPC situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
comment on cloned site — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/scamalerts · 9 points · 10 months ago
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
comment on small win: chromatogram stopped being a problem at week 95 in c/hplc · 109 points · 10 months ago
a round-robin on baseline integration would be genuinely useful
comment on 14 months in and insulin resistance is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1women · 1 points · 10 months ago
cycle changes are real and under-researched
comment on why does nobody talk about fake COA in c/scamalerts · 13 points · 10 months ago
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
comment on contraception — my 11-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1women · 18 points · 11 months ago
cycle changes are real and under-researched
comment on does purity actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/hplc · 0 points · 11 months ago
axis labels included, always
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring discontinuation at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/tapering · 75 points · 12 months ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on three years of purity threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/hplc · 20 points · 1 year ago
Injection volume and flow rate? Those affect resolution.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring integration at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/hplc · 11 points · 1 year ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on PDF metadata — 14 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 1 year ago
Did GGPeps respond or ghost you?