-26
[Discussion] network is doing more work than we give it credit for
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on USDC in this community changed substantially around the start of last year,…
u/cesar_ivaturi
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Osijek.
member · joined 14 May 2025
6,147post karma
8,271comment karma
7submissions
107comments
Overview — page 2 of 5
comment on [Discussion] mg/mL is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/reconstitution · 36 points · 1 months ago
What was the vial size and how much bac water?
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about batch in c/coa · 79 points · 1 months ago
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
comment on [Vendor] QST order #6 — Denmark, 5 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/trialwatch · 2 points · 1 months ago
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
comment on glucagon is the most under-discussed thing in c/scamalerts in c/survodutide · 1 points · 1 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Results] 86 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/reconstitution · -28 points · 1 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on [Meta] the survodutide rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/survodutide · 12 points · 2 months ago
glucagon co-agonism has a different safety story
comment on tried concentration for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/reconstitution · 105 points · 2 months ago
dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on tried MASH for 15 weeks. here is what happened. in c/survodutide · 22 points · 3 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for certificate of analysis posts in c/coa · 113 points · 3 months ago
Did they give you the chromatogram or just the summary line?
comment on week 91 check-in — 17kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/coa · 76 points · 3 months ago
Sent one vial to PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate. 97.9% and 97.2%. Cost me more than the vial did and I would do it again.
comment on week 91 check-in — 17kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/coa · 300 points · 3 months ago
Did they give you the chromatogram or just the summary line?
2.1k
week 91 check-in — 17kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me
Quick one. Canada here. certificate of analysis works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people…
comment on [Meta] the dual agonist rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/survodutide · 1 points · 3 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on Canada: endpoint, and what it actually costs here in c/trialwatch · 33 points · 3 months ago
dropout handling matters, especially on GI-heavy populations
comment on COA: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/coa · 205 points · 4 months ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on someone explain units to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/reconstitution · 82 points · 4 months ago
Is that 15mg vial or 11mg?
comment on [Results] 31 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/customs · 3 points · 4 months ago
Yeah, the Netherlands rules are not global.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on water content — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/coa · 44 points · 4 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on water content — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/coa · 65 points · 4 months ago
Four months on the site and I was confusing area% and mass% in every post I made. One explainer thread and it clicked.