u/deleted_my_history
Nuked my old comments. Starting again with better habits.
member · joined 2 Oct 2024
Comments — page 2 of 3
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about retatrutide until somebody posts a number in c/retatrutide · 113 points · 4 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on week 16 check-in — 42kg down, constipation manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 47 points · 5 months ago
the 1.7mg arm is different from 2.4mg, results do not transfer
comment on [Discussion] jurisdiction is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/customs · 40 points · 5 months ago
What was in the seizure letter?
comment on what changed for me between week 30 and week 79 in c/retatrutide · 51 points · 6 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on help me understand MASH, I have read the wiki twice in c/survodutide · 16 points · 6 months ago
Week 51 for me and the honest summary is: 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
comment on survodutide vs glucagon — genuinely asking which matters more in c/survodutide · 21 points · 8 months ago
This is correct. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
comment on am I the only one who found triple agonist harder than the injections in c/retatrutide · 47 points · 9 months ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
comment on is it normal to get fatigue at week 90 in c/retatrutide · 377 points · 9 months ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring MASH at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/survodutide · 1 points · 10 months ago
do not generalise from tirzepatide
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about phase 2 until somebody posts a number in c/retatrutide · 3 points · 1 year ago
The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.
comment on secretagogue: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/researchpeptides · 15 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on phase 2 — my 12-week log, condensed into one table in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
the 5mg arm is different from 7.5mg, results do not transfer
comment on three years of biopsy threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/survodutide · 13 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. The safety story is separate.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for survodutide posts in c/survodutide · 46 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 1 year ago
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in Germany.
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/researchpeptides · 10 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, identity is the first question.
comment on [Discussion] secretagogue is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/researchpeptides · -33 points · 1 year ago
comment on the ATTAIN thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/orforglipron · 2 points · 1 year ago
cite ATTAIN/ACHIEVE arms specifically
comment on [Results] 37 weeks, 16kg, and phase 2 was the hard part in c/retatrutide · -11 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about thymosin until somebody posts a number in c/researchpeptides · -6 points · 1 year ago
Sweden here. Waited 5 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.