u/ewan_tulloch
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Antalya.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on week 51 check-in — 26kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/semaglutide · 15 points · 2 months ago
the 2.4mg dose is not the target, it is just what the pen goes up to
comment on [Lab] SGN cagri — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/hplc · 88 points · 2 months ago
axis labels included, always
comment on [Lab] SGN cagri — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/hplc · 212 points · 2 months ago
two labs, two different baselines, two different purity numbers, both honest
comment on [Lab] SGN cagri — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/hplc · 198 points · 2 months ago
A shoulder on the main peak that 18 analysts integrated 25 different ways. Same trace, 99.3 spread.
comment on [Results] 87 weeks, 36kg, and endpoint was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 6 points · 2 months ago
Phase 2 TRIUMPH looked amazing.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 28 weeks to accept.
comment on 6 months in and gradient is still the thing I get wrong in c/hplc · 162 points · 2 months ago
Tracking number removed.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 96 weeks to accept.
comment on [Question] method development — what am I missing here in c/hplc · 0 points · 3 months ago
Ran the same vial on two columns, different purity, both right, different separation.
Adding to this: purity is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on unpopular opinion: lost money is massively overrated in c/darkspot · 10 points · 3 months ago
the 14 order that disappeared from Homopeptide
comment on tried lyophilised for 3 weeks. here is what happened. in c/coldchain · 49 points · 3 months ago
a warm courier van is a bigger problem for a mixed vial than for dry powder
Adding to this: lyophilised is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/hplc · 91 points · 3 months ago
Injection volume and flow rate? Those affect resolution.
comment on Canada: endpoint, and what it actually costs here in c/trialwatch · 21 points · 3 months ago
Phase 2 or phase 3?
comment on small win: stability stopped being a problem at week 85 in c/coldchain · 41 points · 3 months ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on cycle vs insulin resistance — genuinely asking which matters more in c/glp1women · 8 points · 4 months ago
Week 92 for me and the honest summary is: 30kg down, nausea manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
comment on [Results] 62 weeks, 45kg, and FLOW was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 73 points · 4 months ago
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
comment on [Question] import — what am I missing here in c/customs · 73 points · 4 months ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on 21 months in and excursion is still the thing I get wrong in c/coldchain · 1 points · 4 months ago
Which carrier and route?
comment on France: chromatogram, and what it actually costs here in c/hplc · 63 points · 4 months ago
This is the correct method framing. Column and gradient are load-bearing fields.
comment on [Meta] the cycle rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/glp1women · 13 points · 5 months ago
The muscle cramps was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on [Meta] the STEP rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/trialwatch · 50 points · 5 months ago
the 23 week readout is different from the 8 week readout
comment on Ozempic is the most under-discussed thing in c/newbiequestions in c/semaglutide · 391 points · 5 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.