2.3k
stalled for 9 weeks at 2.5mg and I refuse to panic this time
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 1.0mg, week 79, injection-site soreness present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one…
u/heart_rate_bump
Resting HR up 6bpm on titration, back down at maintenance. n=1, tracked daily.
member · joined 30 Apr 2024
4,360post karma
5,931comment karma
4submissions
106comments
Overview — page 5 of 5
comment on [Discussion] the UK advice in here is 4 years out of date in c/glp1uk · 90 points · 1 year ago
NHS or private?
comment on week 61 check-in — 46kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bloodwork · 118 points · 1 year ago
What are your reference ranges?
comment on week 61 check-in — 46kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bloodwork · 48 points · 1 year ago
ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy
Adding to this: ferritin is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #23 — France, 9 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/trialwatch · 42 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.
comment on stalled for 8 weeks at 12.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 1 year ago
nobody here can tell you what a result means for you
comment on survodutide vs hepatic fat — genuinely asking which matters more in c/survodutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
Hepatic fat or MASH or what?
comment on stalled for 9 weeks at 2.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/researchpeptides · 256 points · 1 year ago
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
comment on why does nobody talk about secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 18 points · 1 year ago
How many weeks between the two measurements?
comment on three years of ApoB threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/bloodwork · 79 points · 1 year ago
ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy
comment on three years of ApoB threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 1 year ago
ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy
comment on [Results] 2 weeks, 11kg, and glucagon was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 17 points · 1 year ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on 23 months in and pharmacy is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1uk · 64 points · 1 year ago
private prescription routes vary by region
comment on 23 months in and pharmacy is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1uk · 218 points · 1 year ago
it is in the wiki actually
comment on three years of SURMOUNT threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/trialwatch · 53 points · 1 year ago
Is that absolute or relative risk reduction?
comment on three years of SURMOUNT threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/trialwatch · 371 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #2 — Spain, 31 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 3 points · 1 year ago
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
comment on triple agonist: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 years ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
comment on genuine question about TRIUMPH that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/trialwatch · 338 points · 2 years ago
phase 2 is not phase 3, smaller n and shorter trial
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 98.7% on the same vial is normal.
comment on someone explain UK to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/glp1uk · 59 points · 2 years ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.