u/hugo_pires
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Essen.
member · joined 11 Feb 2025
Comments — page 5 of 5
comment on 23 months in and gas fees is still the thing I get wrong in c/cryptopay · 82 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
comment on does dose history actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/dosinglogs · 88 points · 1 year ago
This is correct.
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 97.4% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Lab] 5th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 281 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #2 — Spain, 31 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 18 points · 1 year ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
comment on weekly update is the most under-discussed thing in c/intlshipping in c/dosinglogs · 10 points · 2 years ago
consistency is harder than the dose change
comment on anyone else notice waist kicking in around week 50 in c/dosinglogs · 1 points · 2 years ago
the 22 month update is the real test
comment on [Lab] 24th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/cryptopay · 83 points · 2 years ago
Gas was confirmations on Polygon so I used WXT instead. Confirmation in 11 blocks, vendor credited, done.
comment on [Lab] 24th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/cryptopay · 218 points · 2 years ago
Not to be pedantic but confirmations and escrow are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Lab] 24th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/cryptopay · 127 points · 2 years ago
Which network and did the vendor confirm they credit it?
comment on [Question] amylin — what am I missing here in c/cagrilintide · 35 points · 2 years ago
Rodent or human data?
comment on denial: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/insurancefights · 38 points · 2 years ago
do not suggest misrepresenting a diagnosis, that is fraud
comment on [Discussion] the glucagon advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/retatrutide · 106 points · 2 years ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on stalled for 2 weeks at 7.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/labresults · 221 points · 2 years ago
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
comment on tried retatrutide for 7 weeks. here is what happened. in c/retatrutide · 78 points · 2 years ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on tried test results for 18 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 17 points · 2 years ago
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #9 — the Netherlands, 33 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/insurancefights · 38 points · 2 years ago
External review overturned the denial. Took 4 weeks but the process exists.
comment on switched from 5mg to 2.5mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 493 points · 2 years ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.