u/incretin_ivy
GIP/GLP-1 co-agonism is genuinely interesting pharmacology, separate from the weight story.
long-standing contributor · pharmacology · joined 8 Jul 2024
Overview — page 3 of 5
comment on [Caution] hepatic endpoints need biopsy data, not an ALT screenshot in c/survodutide · 37 points · 12 days ago
Phase 23 or 35?
comment on [Caution] hepatic endpoints need biopsy data, not an ALT screenshot in c/survodutide · 8 points · 12 days ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on [Training] kept my deadlift, lost the belly, ate a lot of chicken in c/glp1muscle · 6 points · 14 days ago
resistance training is sarcopenia not optional
comment on [PSA] semaglutide salt forms are not the same molecule as semaglutide in c/compounding · 9 points · 17 days ago
telehealth prescriber models exist, pricing differs by state
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 76 weeks to accept.
comment on the dose escalation thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/retatrutide · 72 points · 17 days ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on three years of glucagon threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/survodutide · 23 points · 17 days ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on small win: non-peptide stopped being a problem at week 16 in c/orforglipron · 13 points · 17 days ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on [Question] creatine while eating 1,400 calories — worth it in c/glp1muscle · 11 points · 19 days ago
resistance training is DEXA not optional
comment on [Discussion] oral GLP-1 is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/orforglipron · 14 points · 20 days ago
the supply conversation changes if this approves
comment on [Discussion] oral GLP-1 is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/orforglipron · 17 points · 21 days ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on [Needs Source] "it heals your metabolism" is not a mechanism in c/glp1science · 13 points · 21 days ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on [Discussion] the sarcopenia question nobody funded properly in c/glp1muscle · 14 points · 22 days ago
Slight fix: the number was 93.7, not 99.3. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on what changed for me between week 15 and week 64 in c/researchpeptides · 34 points · 25 days ago
Yeah, identity is the first question.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether glucagon is why in c/retatrutide · 105 points · 25 days ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on co-agonism — my 4-week log, condensed into one table in c/cagrilintide · 6 points · 27 days ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on why does nobody talk about TRIUMPH in c/retatrutide · 17 points · 27 days ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on small win: satiety stopped being a problem at week 75 in c/cagrilintide · 6 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. REDEFINE is phase 9, not final.
comment on small win: satiety stopped being a problem at week 75 in c/cagrilintide · 7 points · 1 months ago
REDEFINE phase 7 readouts are interesting but 7 person CagriSema is different from 7 trial CagriSema.
comment on small win: satiety stopped being a problem at week 75 in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 1 months ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on small win: satiety stopped being a problem at week 75 in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 1 months ago
The research community is small on cagrilintide. Forum lore changes faster than data.