u/injection_site_iris
Site rotation map on my fridge. Zero lumps in 14 months.
member · joined 27 Aug 2024
comment on [Paper] survodutide MASH data is the most interesting hepatic readout in the class in c/survodutide · 23 points · 1 days ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Stats] relative risk reduction sells papers, absolute risk reduction makes decisions in c/trialwatch · 9 points · 2 days ago
What was the dropout rate?
comment on [Lab] two reta batches, two services, 98.4% and 97.9% in c/retatrutide · 15 points · 2 days ago
The glucagon component does different things than dual agonism.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on went too fast on reta and my resting HR told me before i noticed in c/retatrutide · 45 points · 3 days ago
This is correct.
Adding to this: TRIUMPH is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Caution] this is not approved anywhere and half this community forgets that in c/retatrutide · 52 points · 3 days ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on [Pricing] ON vs AB vs BC, same product, same month in c/glp1canada · 3 points · 4 days ago
province is the cross-province difference
comment on [Trial Data] STEP 1 vs SURMOUNT-1 side by side, with the caveats in c/trialwatch · 36 points · 7 days ago
Phase 2 or phase 3?
comment on [Question] interval stretching vs dose reduction — is either better in c/tapering · 10 points · 8 days ago
Not to be pedantic but regain and discontinuation are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Question] interval stretching vs dose reduction — is either better in c/tapering · 1 points · 9 days ago
cite the discontinuation data rather than guessing regain rates
comment on three years of special authorization threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1canada · 12 points · 14 days ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
comment on [Discussion] restarting is not failing and we should say that louder in c/tapering · -2 points · 14 days ago
Maintenance for 17 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
comment on [Question] how long were you on before you tapered in c/tapering · 48 points · 17 days ago
Strongly agree. The regain is expected.
comment on the dose escalation thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/retatrutide · 79 points · 18 days ago
Research use material only, no human-use approval anywhere. Posts must describe what happened, not instruct strangers.
comment on the appetite return question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/tapering · 60 points · 25 days ago
regain on taper is expected, plan for it
comment on province — my 19-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1canada · 6 points · 27 days ago
Canada is the cross-province difference
comment on [Discussion] glucagon is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/survodutide · 32 points · 1 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on [Discussion] glucagon is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/survodutide · 11 points · 1 months ago
glucagon co-agonism has a different safety story
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify glucagon in c/survodutide · 11 points · 1 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify glucagon in c/survodutide · 8 points · 1 months ago
glucagon co-agonism has a different safety story
comment on [Rules] no referral links. not once. not ever. permanent. in c/meta · -2 points · 1 months ago
rules, moderation, ranking, wiki