Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking appetite return against eGFR for 23 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is…
u/ismael_eriksen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Braga.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Overview — page 5 of 5
comment on 22 months in and timeframe is still the thing I get wrong in c/progresspics · 144 points · 1 year ago
comment on tried interval stretching for 3 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tapering · 32 points · 1 year ago
interval stretching versus dose reduction
comment on tried interval stretching for 3 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tapering · -13 points · 1 year ago
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in Canada.
comment on tried interval stretching for 3 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tapering · 10 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 12 weeks, not 8. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #17 — Germany, 5 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/progresspics · 35 points · 1 year ago
text removes the body-shaming pile-on
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #17 — Germany, 5 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/progresspics · 88 points · 1 year ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again.
Adding to this: milestone is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on week 61 check-in — 46kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bloodwork · 38 points · 1 year ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on dose escalation: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 45 points · 1 year ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on stalled for 8 weeks at 12.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 1 year ago
A1c moves slowly, quarterly is plenty
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring certificate of analysis at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 5 points · 1 year ago
Crossposting this to c/semaglutide because the people who need it are not reading this community.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.4% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Results] 7 weeks, 26kg, and mechanism was the hard part in c/glp1science · -36 points · 1 year ago
receptor distribution matters, GLP-1 is not everywhere
comment on switched from 2.5mg to 2.4mg and the reflux got better, not worse in c/bloodwork · 28 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on triple agonist is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1uk in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
the dosing is steep, the muscle cramps reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring bloodwork at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/bloodwork · 43 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. ApoB is the better marker.
comment on tried A1c for 22 weeks. here is what happened. in c/bloodwork · 140 points · 1 year ago
redact identifying details from lab PDFs before posting
comment on tried A1c for 22 weeks. here is what happened. in c/bloodwork · 191 points · 1 year ago
My A1c went from 18 to 40 in 50 weeks. The baseline labs story shows up in the trend, not the single number.
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/t2dglp1 repeats that baseline labs is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I…
comment on test results — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 601 points · 1 year ago
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
comment on test results — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 105 points · 1 year ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.