u/karim_hartmann
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Adana.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
comment on [Sceptic] the tendon claims outran the evidence by about a decade in c/bpc157 · 2 points · 2 days ago
pentadecapeptide is regulatory, the supply chain naming is a mess
comment on [Lab] three BPC vials, three vendors, purity all over the place in c/bpc157 · 9 points · 3 days ago
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
comment on [PSA] no tracking numbers. they identify both ends. removed on sight. in c/intlshipping · -13 points · 4 days ago
lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, actual transit days
comment on [Question] which networks do vendors actually credit reliably in c/cryptopay · -15 points · 4 days ago
Not to be pedantic but gas fees and crypto are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [PSA] no tracking numbers. they identify both ends. removed on sight. in c/intlshipping · 96 points · 4 days ago
Customs held the package for 23 days. No problems, just time. Factor it into expectations.
comment on [Question] does carrier choice matter more than origin city in c/intlshipping · 16 points · 4 days ago
the VendorInvestigate number or it did not happen
Adding to this: EMS is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [PSA] no tracking numbers. they identify both ends. removed on sight. in c/intlshipping · 9 points · 5 days ago
This is correct. Variance is the story.
comment on the mean transit time is useless, the 90th percentile is what melts your pack in c/intlshipping · 12 points · 8 days ago
origin to destination, carrier, transit variance
comment on [Lab] identity confirmed but net peptide content was 71% in c/bpc157 · 9 points · 16 days ago
tendon and rodent data literature in rodents is interesting
comment on [Discussion] we have no vocabulary for success that is not a number going down in c/maintenancephase · 27 points · 17 days ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Discussion] we have no vocabulary for success that is not a number going down in c/maintenancephase · 49 points · 18 days ago
regain after taper is expected, plan for it
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring confirmations at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/cryptopay · 19 points · 23 days ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on tried carrier for 4 weeks. here is what happened. in c/intlshipping · 1 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #11 — Denmark, 13 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 1 months ago
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
comment on [Vendor] QST order #11 — Denmark, 13 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/cryptopay · -18 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
comment on three years of EMS threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/intlshipping · 18 points · 1 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on regulatory is the most under-discussed thing in c/meta in c/bpc157 · 2 points · 2 months ago
BPC regulatory is a naming problem, three things are called this
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 15kg, and chargeback was the hard part in c/cryptopay · 13 points · 2 months ago
never post a wallet address, not yours, not a vendor's
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the reflux got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · 93 points · 3 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on three years of confirmations threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/cryptopay · 6 points · 3 months ago
This is correct.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 68 weeks to accept.