u/mateusz_mensah
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Nairobi.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/hplc · 1 points · 3 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 7 weeks, not 29. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Results] 12 weeks, 35kg, and glucagon was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 63 points · 3 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on am I the only one who found test results harder than the injections in c/labresults · 69 points · 4 months ago
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
comment on the HPLC thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/hplc · 1 points · 4 months ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on anyone else notice Medutest kicking in around week 30 in c/labresults · 72 points · 4 months ago
multiple batches from GGPeps show a spread, that is the data
comment on three years of integration threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/hplc · 115 points · 4 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on someone explain HPLC to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/hplc · 9 points · 4 months ago
related substances are where the story lives, not the main peak
comment on small win: test results stopped being a problem at week 16 in c/labresults · 26 points · 5 months ago
the 99.0% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #4 — Germany, 13 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · -24 points · 5 months ago
Did you actually measure heart rate or is that a feeling?
comment on [Lab] 14th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 454 points · 5 months ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 50 in c/glp1women · 32 points · 6 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on what changed for me between week 30 and week 79 in c/retatrutide · 76 points · 6 months ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on Denmark: ACHIEVE, and what it actually costs here in c/orforglipron · 18 points · 7 months ago
Not to be pedantic but small molecule and oral GLP-1 are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on is it normal to get constipation at week 14 in c/orforglipron · 0 points · 7 months ago
Strongly agree. The supply impact would be huge.
comment on three years of Medutest threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/labresults · 9 points · 7 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on three years of Medutest threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/labresults · 7 points · 7 months ago
sample of one, say so
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on LC-MS in c/hplc · 1 points · 7 months ago
Did they post the raw trace or just the summary?
comment on anyone else notice small molecule kicking in around week 59 in c/orforglipron · 1 points · 8 months ago
Strongly agree.
Adding to this: ACHIEVE is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on anyone else notice phase 2 kicking in around week 44 in c/retatrutide · 47 points · 8 months ago
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
comment on [Question] purity — what am I missing here in c/hplc · 206 points · 8 months ago