u/milan_villalobos
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Linköping.
member · joined 17 Aug 2025
Comments — page 3 of 4
comment on [Discussion] the gallbladder advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/sideeffects · 23 points · 11 months ago
Went to A&E convinced it was pancreatitis. Lipase normal. It was gallstones. Get checked, do not post and wait.
comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 45 in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on stalled for 2 weeks at 1.7mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/scamalerts · 7 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but fraud and cloned site are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Adding to this: group buy is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on small win: heart rate stopped being a problem at week 16 in c/sideeffects · 78 points · 1 year ago
hair loss is real and usually reversible when you stabilize
comment on [Lab] 7th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/labresults · 8 points · 1 year ago
sample of one, say so
comment on week 31 check-in — 22kg down, muscle cramps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/sideeffects · 15 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on stalled for 4 weeks at 2.4mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/sideeffects · 46 points · 1 year ago
week 19 and the early fullness is finally getting better
comment on 14 months in and fake COA is still the thing I get wrong in c/scamalerts · 21 points · 1 year ago
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
comment on 14 months in and fake COA is still the thing I get wrong in c/scamalerts · 40 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
comment on three years of fatigue threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 1 year ago
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 96 is worth checking
comment on anyone else notice SURPASS kicking in around week 19 in c/trialwatch · 89 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #21 — France, 39 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/labresults · 128 points · 1 year ago
the 99.0% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
comment on [PSA] heart rate is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/sideeffects · 61 points · 1 year ago
My reflux was worst at 5mg and better at 12.5mg, which makes no sense but it is real.
comment on the nausea question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/sideeffects · -2 points · 1 year ago
IANAD and neither is anyone upvoting this
comment on the nausea question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/sideeffects · 7 points · 1 year ago
ask your actual doctor, not us
comment on test results — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 261 points · 1 year ago
comment on three years of SURMOUNT threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/trialwatch · 96 points · 1 year ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on [Discussion] the Medutest advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/labresults · 12 points · 1 year ago
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
comment on [Meta] the gallbladder rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/sideeffects · 7 points · 1 year ago
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 4–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
comment on anyone else notice exit scam kicking in around week 75 in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 2 years ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds