652
[Results] 92 weeks, 15kg, and BPC-157 was the hard part
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 5mg, week 54, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable —…
u/nikhil_lindqvist
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Antalya.
member · joined 17 Aug 2025
22,170post karma
17,442comment karma
11submissions
149comments
Overview — page 2 of 5
comment on [Discussion] TRIUMPH is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/retatrutide · 2 points · 1 months ago
heart rate and dose escalation need actual measurements, not impressions
comment on TRIUMPH: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 22 points · 1 months ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on clothes fit the same for 14 months and it is genuinely strange in c/maintenancephase · 122 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, maintenance is the boring part and the important part.
comment on [Discussion] appetite return is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/tapering · -7 points · 1 months ago
appetite return timelines vary tapering
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify pentadecapeptide in c/bpc157 · 5 points · 1 months ago
BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this
comment on why does nobody talk about purity in c/coa · 31 points · 1 months ago
axis labels included, always
comment on anyone else notice certificate of analysis kicking in around week 75 in c/coa · -20 points · 1 months ago
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
comment on Germany: water content, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 13 points · 2 months ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 1.7mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · 45 points · 2 months ago
the 2.4mg dose works fine for 81 weeks of the month
comment on unpopular opinion: BPC-157 is massively overrated in c/bpc157 · -29 points · 2 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with tendon, not with what you concluded.
comment on declared value: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/customs · 1 points · 2 months ago
declared value is customs, impacts duty
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on interval stretching in c/tapering · 32 points · 2 months ago
Yeah, regain is not a failure.
comment on cloned site is the most under-discussed thing in c/hplc in c/scamalerts · 177 points · 2 months ago
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
comment on [Results] 92 weeks, 15kg, and BPC-157 was the hard part in c/bpc157 · 107 points · 2 months ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
comment on help me understand glucagon, I have read the wiki twice in c/retatrutide · 124 points · 3 months ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on what changed for me between week 80 and week 28 in c/customs · -33 points · 3 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 12 weeks, not 16. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
0
three years of regain threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
Right, the interval stretching question again, but with numbers this time. I have 3 data points over 4 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is…
comment on France: BPC-157, and what it actually costs here in c/bpc157 · 16 points · 3 months ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on endpoint — my 2-week log, condensed into one table in c/trialwatch · 24 points · 3 months ago
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.