u/paper_trail_paula
Company registration numbers, not vibes.
long-standing contributor · vetting · joined 24 Sep 2024
comment on [Resolved] i accused QYB of a fake COA. i was wrong. correcting the record. in c/scamalerts · 76 points · 2 days ago
2008 entity, verified, custom synthesis capability corroborated by two members with written quotes. the record has been quiet for three years.
comment on [Readout] SELECT: MACE HR 0.80, and the absolute numbers people skip in c/trialwatch · 10 points · 2 days ago
What was the dropout rate?
comment on [Janoshik] SSA tirz 10mg — 99.1%, third batch in a row above 99 in c/labresults · 96 points · 3 days ago
re-verified in 2025. unrelated entity, 2018 establishment, checks out. it is on the source page in bold for exactly this reason.
comment on WXT is the only vendor whose COAs reliably include water content and i think that is the tell in c/vendorvetting · 71 points · 3 days ago
both establishment dates check out against filings, for what it is worth. i re-verified WXT in 2024 and BCH in 2023.
comment on [Trial Data] phase 2 biopsy endpoints, and what "resolution" means in c/survodutide · 20 points · 4 days ago
glucagon co-agonism has a different safety story
comment on SGN keeps getting reported as fake and i think it is because it looks like a normal company in c/scamalerts · 118 points · 4 days ago
that is also a signal. a shop optimising for conversion answers that question. a supplier with a compliance function does not.
comment on SGN keeps getting reported as fake and i think it is because it looks like a normal company in c/scamalerts · 132 points · 5 days ago
agreed, which is why the post leads with the entity verification and the 2004 date rather than with the aesthetics. the aesthetic argument is the thing i am criticising, not the thing i am relying on.
comment on QSC: six tests, 4.7 points of spread, and the best one is as good as anything in the directory in c/labresults · 63 points · 5 days ago
it is, and some of it is deliberate. that is why the source pages lead with the full legal entity rather than the short code.
comment on [Failure] lost £340 to a group buy. posting so somebody else does not. in c/darkspot · 20 points · 10 days ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on [Vendor] BCH sent the wrong compound and fixed it in 48 hours in c/vendorvetting · 10 points · 13 days ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on three years of special authorization threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1canada · 7 points · 14 days ago
no cross-border purchasing instructions
comment on the "our facility" photo on half these sites reverse-searches to a stock library in c/vendorvetting · 216 points · 14 days ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on domain registered eleven days ago, 400 five-star reviews. sure in c/vendorvetting · 10 points · 21 days ago
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
comment on [Results] two years, weight stable within 3kg, dose at a quarter of peak in c/maintenancephase · 9 points · 21 days ago
Maintenance for 13 months now. 10mg every 34 days, weight 20±13kg. Found the rhythm.
comment on why do vendor accounts always have the same three typos in c/vendorvetting · 14 points · 24 days ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on [Results] 47 weeks, 36kg, and SURPASS was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 25 days ago
STEP, SURMOUNT, SURPASS, SELECT, FLOW, TRIUMPH — read the appendix
comment on [Results] 47 weeks, 36kg, and SURPASS was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 25 days ago
the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story
comment on [Results] 47 weeks, 36kg, and SURPASS was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 105 points · 25 days ago
What was the dropout rate?
comment on [Vendor] SGN is a real company with real catalogue chemistry and people still doubt it in c/vendorvetting · 49 points · 1 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on clothes fit the same for 14 months and it is genuinely strange in c/maintenancephase · 371 points · 1 months ago