u/paper_trail_paula
Company registration numbers, not vibes.
long-standing contributor · vetting · joined 24 Sep 2024
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on [Discussion] the reship advice in here is 13 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 67 points · 8 months ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
comment on small win: dose stretching stopped being a problem at week 85 in c/maintenancephase · 6 points · 8 months ago
regain after taper is expected, plan for it
comment on testing — 12 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/vendorvetting · 81 points · 8 months ago
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #19 — Germany, 7 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/maintenancephase · 2 points · 9 months ago
food noise returns but not always immediately
comment on the regain question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/maintenancephase · 4 points · 9 months ago
weight moves within 2kg and that is normal
comment on genuine question about testing that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/vendorvetting · 207 points · 9 months ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on goal weight — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 54 points · 10 months ago
Strongly agree. Lowest effective dose is a real discovery process.
comment on goal weight — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 10 months ago
food noise returns but not always immediately
comment on the vendor question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/vendorvetting · 36 points · 10 months ago
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
comment on goal weight — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 161 points · 10 months ago
regain is not a moral failing
comment on the vendor question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/vendorvetting · 34 points · 10 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 20 weeks, not 16. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on the vendor question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/vendorvetting · 234 points · 10 months ago
BCH took 2 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
comment on switched from 0.5mg to 0.25mg and the nausea got better, not worse in c/vendorvetting · 353 points · 10 months ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify lowest effective dose in c/maintenancephase · 114 points · 10 months ago
Yeah, maintenance is the boring part and the important part.
comment on small win: VendorInvestigate stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/vendorvetting · 8 points · 11 months ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
comment on anyone else notice regain kicking in around week 90 in c/maintenancephase · 27 points · 12 months ago
Yeah, maintenance is the boring part and the important part.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #10 — the Netherlands, 23 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 1 year ago
regain is not a moral failing
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about PeptideMeter until somebody posts a number in c/vendorvetting · 244 points · 1 year ago
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
comment on tried province for 10 weeks. here is what happened. in c/glp1canada · 164 points · 1 year ago
special authorisation is province-specific
comment on am I the only one who found goal weight harder than the injections in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 1 year ago
the 1.7mg dose works fine for 19 weeks of the month