u/rina_sobczak
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Enugu.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for co-agonism posts in c/cagrilintide · 4 points · 6 months ago
the amylin agonist pool is small, community is satiety
comment on [Results] 46 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/cagrilintide · 4 points · 6 months ago
not approved anywhere, keep posts descriptive, not instructional
comment on 6 months in and fertility is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1women · 5 points · 7 months ago
no cycle-tracking data with identifying details
comment on anyone else notice co-agonism kicking in around week 5 in c/cagrilintide · 41 points · 7 months ago
long-acting amylin is co-agonism, different satiety profile
comment on anyone else notice co-agonism kicking in around week 5 in c/cagrilintide · 133 points · 7 months ago
This is correct. The co-agonism is real.
comment on small win: fertility stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/glp1women · 11 points · 8 months ago
the cycle question is under-powered in trials
comment on reading SURPASS threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 21 points · 8 months ago
Not to be pedantic but FLOW and hazard ratio are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on the 503A thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/compounding · 4 points · 11 months ago
regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, not interpretation
comment on co-agonism — my 6-week log, condensed into one table in c/cagrilintide · 94 points · 11 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #8 — Canada, 7 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/labresults · 12 points · 12 months ago
the 98.7% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
comment on someone explain cagrilintide to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/cagrilintide · 2 points · 1 year ago
amylin receptor distribution is different from GLP-1
comment on stalled for 18 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/labresults · 9 points · 1 year ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on API source: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/compounding · 9 points · 1 year ago
Are we talking 503A or 503B?
comment on week 91 check-in — 6kg down, constipation manageable, one thing confusing me in c/compounding · 2 points · 1 year ago
no pharmacy referral codes, naming is fine, recruiting is not
comment on [Lab] 7th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/labresults · 8 points · 1 year ago
Was that the vendor COA or your own test?
comment on unpopular opinion: cycle is massively overrated in c/glp1women · 36 points · 1 year ago
Second this question. I have wondered about cycle for 23 months and never seen a straight answer.
comment on tried SURPASS for 11 weeks. here is what happened. in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/labresults · 270 points · 1 year ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on compounding — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/compounding · 14 points · 1 year ago
shortage list status is 503B, check the actual list
comment on [Question] perimenopause — what am I missing here in c/glp1women · 1 points · 1 year ago
hormonal contraception interactions are speculative