u/rulebook_rachael
Wrote most of the community rules you are about to break. Sorry in advance.
moderator · mod · c/meta · joined 11 Oct 2023
Comments — page 2 of 3
comment on genuine question about cloned site that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/scamalerts · 5 points · 4 months ago
Which order and did you have any communication from WWB?
comment on three years of rules threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/meta · 42 points · 5 months ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on the hazard ratio thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/trialwatch · 89 points · 6 months ago
dropout handling matters, especially on GI-heavy populations
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 39 weeks to accept.
comment on genuine question about SELECT that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/trialwatch · 13 points · 6 months ago
the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story
comment on small win: PDF metadata stopped being a problem at week 40 in c/scamalerts · 48 points · 9 months ago
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on rules in c/meta · 305 points · 10 months ago
Did anything else change in the same window?
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on rules in c/meta · 55 points · 10 months ago
the evidence standards are rules
comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 45 in c/trialwatch · 8 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 4 weeks, not 31. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on 18 months in and hazard ratio is still the thing I get wrong in c/trialwatch · 84 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Discontinuation arms show the regain reality.
comment on tried SURPASS for 11 weeks. here is what happened. in c/trialwatch · 104 points · 1 year ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about hazard ratio in c/trialwatch · 0 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about hazard ratio in c/trialwatch · 30 points · 1 year ago
SELECT reported a TRIUMPH hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about hazard ratio in c/trialwatch · 28 points · 1 year ago
the discontinuation arms are the interesting part, not the SURPASS endpoints
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify ranking in c/meta · 1 points · 1 year ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on SELECT — 9 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/trialwatch · 16 points · 1 year ago
the 16 week readout is different from the 5 week readout
comment on [Discussion] the moderation advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/meta · 1 points · 1 year ago
Did anything else change in the same window?
comment on [Discussion] the moderation advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/meta · 89 points · 1 year ago
Did anything else change in the same window?
comment on 14 months in and fake COA is still the thing I get wrong in c/scamalerts · 75 points · 1 year ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on does FLOW actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/trialwatch · 2 points · 1 year ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.2, not 99.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on France: meta, and what it actually costs here in c/meta · 1 points · 1 year ago
the evidence standards are meta