u/sofia_nascimento
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Verona.
member · joined 17 Aug 2025
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on what changed for me between week 15 and week 58 in c/tirzepatide · 1 points · 3 months ago
Strongly agree. Tirz is better than sema is not a claim without a comparator dose.
comment on VendorInvestigate: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/vendorvetting · 42 points · 3 months ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on help me understand API source, I have read the wiki twice in c/compounding · 60 points · 3 months ago
Did they tell you their API source or dodge the question?
comment on tried tirzepatide for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tirzepatide · 65 points · 3 months ago
week 40 on Mounjaro and the appetite profile is genuinely different from sema
comment on 15mg vs GIP — genuinely asking which matters more in c/tirzepatide · -28 points · 5 months ago
Hard agree. The food noise disappears differently on the two compounds.
comment on what changed for me between week 5 and week 48 in c/tirzepatide · 1 points · 5 months ago
the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 97.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Results] 7 weeks, 41kg, and formulary was the hard part in c/insurancefights · 79 points · 5 months ago
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring vendor at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 53 points · 5 months ago
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring 15mg at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/tirzepatide · 31 points · 6 months ago
the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery
comment on week 51 check-in — 11kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 46 points · 6 months ago
the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
comment on [Discussion] the reship advice in here is 13 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 10 points · 8 months ago
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #8 — Spain, 33 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/tirzepatide · 55 points · 8 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on testing — 12 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/vendorvetting · 179 points · 8 months ago
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
comment on someone explain appeal to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/insurancefights · -16 points · 9 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 93 weeks to accept.
comment on someone explain appeal to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/insurancefights · 12 points · 9 months ago
formulary exclusions are negotiable sometimes
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on is it normal to get nausea at week 10 in c/tirzepatide · 13 points · 9 months ago
Did you stay on semaglutide or switch? The outcome is different if you are comparing.
comment on nobody warned me about sulphur burps and I would have liked the warning in c/tirzepatide · 263 points · 10 months ago
week 40 on Mounjaro and the appetite profile is genuinely different from sema
comment on small win: VendorInvestigate stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/vendorvetting · 17 points · 11 months ago
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
comment on anyone else notice SURMOUNT kicking in around week 20 in c/tirzepatide · 100 points · 11 months ago
week 28 on Mounjaro and the appetite profile is genuinely different from sema
comment on anyone else notice SURMOUNT kicking in around week 20 in c/tirzepatide · 51 points · 11 months ago
week 13 on Mounjaro and the appetite profile is genuinely different from sema