u/tidy_vialdrawer_pls
Came for one answer, stayed for three years.
member · joined 15 Dec 2023
comment on TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same product and vendors know that in c/researchpeptides · 9 points · 3 days ago
purity and identity are two questions
comment on SURMOUNT-1 was -20.9% at 72 weeks. that is the number, not -30% in c/tirzepatide · 137 points · 16 days ago
the 15mg is the top of the pen, not the required dose
comment on PDF producer string says the file was made in a browser. is that normal in c/coa · 0 points · 18 days ago
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing
comment on [Lab] selectivity claims are usually receptor-panel marketing in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 20 days ago
Yeah, identity is the first question.
comment on net peptide content vs purity — two different numbers, same vial in c/coa · 24 points · 23 days ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on why do people talk about units and mg like they are different things in c/newbiequestions · 7 points · 1 months ago
what is a COA — certificate of analysis, document from the lab
comment on is the wiki up to date, and where do i start in it in c/newbiequestions · 11 points · 1 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on identity and quantity are two questions and most COAs answer one in c/coa · 10 points · 1 months ago
post the whole document, not the headline number
comment on identity and quantity are two questions and most COAs answer one in c/coa · 79 points · 1 months ago
Metadata check caught a COA that was created in a browser four months after the analysis date. Not evidence of fraud, but worth flagging to Homopeptide.
comment on anyone else notice water content kicking in around week 50 in c/coa · 19 points · 1 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on why does nobody talk about handling in c/researchpeptides · 3 points · 1 months ago
Crossposting this to c/cagrilintide because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about week one in c/newbiequestions · 9 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, that is totally normal for week 11.
comment on the water content question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/coa · 153 points · 1 months ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on small win: GIP stopped being a problem at week 31 in c/tirzepatide · 6 points · 1 months ago
do not crack the pen, we have been over this
Adding to this: dual agonist is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on small win: GIP stopped being a problem at week 31 in c/tirzepatide · 7 points · 1 months ago
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 3–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for first time posts in c/newbiequestions · 41 points · 2 months ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on does basics actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/newbiequestions · 7 points · 2 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 13 weeks, not 21. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on tried tirzepatide for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tirzepatide · 52 points · 3 months ago
Switched from sema at 12.5mg to tirz at 15mg. Different drugs, cannot compare the doses directly.
comment on tried tirzepatide for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tirzepatide · 67 points · 3 months ago
the GIP side does different things than the GLP-1 side, that is the point
comment on tried tirzepatide for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tirzepatide · 95 points · 3 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising.
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.