u/tidy_vialdrawer_watch28

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with area percent, not with what you concluded.

Reconstituted or dry powder?

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

The gel pack lasted 20 hours in a courier van, then liquid. Powder itself fine, the cold chain mostly died in transit.

customs clearance often breaks the cold chain, factor that in

Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.

Are you looking at area% or net peptide content? Different numbers.

Peak temperature and how long at that temperature?

purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial Disagree on that part.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.

chromatogram or it did not happen

lyophilised powder is far more forgiving than reconstituted solution

excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"

Strongly agree. Peak temperature is not the whole story.

Strongly agree. Peak temperature is not the whole story.

axis labels included, always

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

Which carrier and route?