0
what would you tell week-1 you about constipation
Right, the sulphur burps question again, but with numbers this time. I have 20 data points over 14 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is…
u/wrong_network_w
Sent USDC on the wrong chain once. Once was enough. Test with $5 first.
member · joined 2 Mar 2024
13,898post karma
4,936comment karma
4submissions
58comments
Overview — page 2 of 4
comment on [Results] 21 weeks on 1.0mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/cagrilintide · 0 points · 3 months ago
not approved anywhere, keep posts descriptive, not instructional
comment on COA: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/coa · 1 points · 4 months ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on help me understand purity, I have read the wiki twice in c/coa · 1 points · 4 months ago
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
comment on stalled for 20 weeks at 1.0mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 231 points · 5 months ago
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
comment on week 76 check-in — 22kg down, muscle cramps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/cagrilintide · 4 points · 5 months ago
amylin is not a GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected
comment on [Lab] SGN BPC — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/coa · 718 points · 6 months ago
i do not know. that is the honest answer.
comment on [Discussion] the CagriSema advice in here is 14 years out of date in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 8 months ago
the amylin agonist pool is small, community is satiety
comment on the Netherlands: area percent, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 10 points · 8 months ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
comment on small win: satiety stopped being a problem at week 30 in c/cagrilintide · 57 points · 8 months ago
REDEFINE phase 8 readouts are interesting but 8 person CagriSema is different from 8 trial CagriSema.
comment on research peptides vs TB-500 — genuinely asking which matters more in c/researchpeptides · 9 points · 9 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on research peptides vs TB-500 — genuinely asking which matters more in c/researchpeptides · 34 points · 9 months ago
Strongly agree. Evidence level matters.
comment on 21 months in and sulphur burps is still the thing I get wrong in c/sideeffects · 184 points · 9 months ago
Same experience. Week 90 and it simply stopped. I know that is not useful information but it is what happened.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about amylin in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 9 months ago
REDEFINE which arm?
comment on genuine question about batch that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/coa · 3 points · 10 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 15mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/researchpeptides · 44 points · 11 months ago
This is correct. Name it precisely.
comment on [Discussion] the gallbladder advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/sideeffects · 22 points · 11 months ago
week 15 and the nausea is finally getting better
comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 30kg, and hair loss was the hard part in c/sideeffects · 9 points · 1 year ago
hair loss is real and usually reversible when you stabilize
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about constipation in c/sideeffects · 2 points · 1 year ago
The constipation passes. I kept a log and the timeline was the only useful thing. 5 weeks and it was basically gone.
comment on three years of certificate of analysis threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 35 points · 1 year ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters