u/yannick_haddad
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Genoa.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Comments — page 2 of 2
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify area percent in c/coa · 1 points · 11 months ago
post the whole document, not the headline number
comment on small win: sarcopenia stopped being a problem at week 31 in c/glp1muscle · 15 points · 1 year ago
FFMI tracking requires body composition
comment on does seizure actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/customs · 25 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Jurisdiction matters.
comment on DEXA: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1muscle · 9 points · 1 year ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on three years of declared value threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/customs · 50 points · 1 year ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on related substances is the most under-discussed thing in c/scamalerts in c/coa · 50 points · 1 year ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about area percent in c/coa · 170 points · 1 year ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on protein: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/glp1muscle · 9 points · 1 year ago
Did anything else change in the same window?
comment on genuine question about purity that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/coa · 63 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on stalled for 23 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 16 points · 1 year ago
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing
comment on seizure vs declared value — genuinely asking which matters more in c/customs · 29 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 20 weeks, not 35. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on reading batch threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/coa · 760 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on area percent — my 20-week log, condensed into one table in c/coa · 323 points · 1 year ago
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
comment on area percent — my 20-week log, condensed into one table in c/coa · 253 points · 1 year ago
This is the correct framing.
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring COA at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 308 points · 2 years ago
the related substances line is where the story is
comment on jurisdiction is the most under-discussed thing in c/researchpeptides in c/customs · 9 points · 2 years ago
personal-import allowances differ by country
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for COA posts in c/coa · 206 points · 2 years ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.