ferritin — my 8-week log, condensed into one table
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.
The advice on ApoB in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.
I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
baseline is the most important lipids measurement, you cannot collect it later
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
the 23 month bloodwork check is the routine
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Tracking number removed.
Adding to this: lipids is doing more work than the comment implies.
eGFR noise on rapid loss is real. 5 week noise, 16 week trend. Do not panic at week 79.
Crossposting this to c/reconstitution because the people who need it are not reading this community.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
ApoB from 19 to 4 is movement, not noise
Is that fasted?
ALT from 16 to 19 is movement, not noise
What are your reference ranges?
Yeah, baseline matters more than any later number.
ferritin tanks quietly on a reduced appetite, check it
redact identifying details from lab PDFs before posting
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
This is correct. ApoB is the better marker.
- 1Crossposting this to c/reconstitution because the people who need it are not…11 comments in this branch · started by u/gentle_correction
- 2You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.5 comments in this branch · started by u/whois_wanda