certificate of analysis — my 17-week log, condensed into one table
Right, the batch question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 15 data points over 4 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 39, not week 88. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
Crossposting this to c/sideeffects because the people who need it are not reading this community.
post the whole document, not the headline number
I am going to push back on this slightly.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 9 weeks to accept.
the related substances line is where the story is
the related substances line is where the story is
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
the batch number or it did not happen
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
post the whole document, not the headline number
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
- 1genuinely useful, thanks4 comments in this branch · started by u/freya_baptista