15 months in and lowest effective dose is still the thing I get wrong
long term. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.
Everything else people worry about in c/intlshipping is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort long term out first, and almost nobody does.
I say this having got it wrong for 21 months. My eGFR was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Strongly agree. Lowest effective dose is a real discovery process.
Mechanistically the bit that matters is goal weight. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Strongly agree. Lowest effective dose is a real discovery process.
lowest effective dose is dose stretching, find it or stay higher
lowest effective dose is dose stretching, find it or stay higher
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 97.4% on the same vial is normal.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 14–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
- 1Strongly agree. Lowest effective dose is a real discovery process.6 comments in this branch · started by u/noor_vermeulen